|
CLASSIC STRUCTURES
αβ-tubulin
Eva Nogales
|
|
..
|
|
Introduction
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
..
|
|
Microtubules are cytoskeletal polymers
present in all eukaryotic cells and are required for cellular
transport, cell motility, and mitosis. Each microtubule is a
cylindrical tube made up of protofilaments, which in turn consist of
repeating αβ-tubulin
heterodimers bound head to tail. The ability to switch stochastically
between growing and shrinking phases is essential to the function of
microtubules. This phenomenon, known as dynamic instability, is due to
the GTPase activity of the tubulin monomers (see Dynamic instability of microtubules)
(3295 ). The structure of the α
β-tubulin heterodimer provides insight into how nucleotide
hydrolysis affects the polymerization state of microtubules.
|
|
..
|
|
Background
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
..
|
|
Tubulin is an αβ
dimeric protein that self-assembles into protofilaments. Typically, 13
of these protofilaments associate in parallel to make the microtubule
wall. The parallel arrangement of protofilaments gives rise to a
structure with a well-defined polarity, such that polymerization occurs
more frequently at one end of the microtubule (called the plus end)
than at the other (the minus end).
|
|
..
|
|
Tubulin is highly conserved across
species, reflecting the sequence constraints imposed by microtubule
structure and function. Both α and
β subunits exist in numerous isotypic
forms and undergo a variety of posttranslational modifications (for a review see 3615).
This variability is thought to be important for the interaction of
tubulin with a variety of associated proteins and ligands (for reviews
on how proteins and ligands affect the properties of microtubules, see 3605 and 3608).
|
|
..
|
|
The α-tubulin and
β-tubulin
monomers each bind one molecule of GTP, but they differ in their
ability to exchange the nucleotide. The nucleotide bound to
α-tubulin, at the so-called N-site,
cannot be exchanged. The nucleotide bound to β-tubulin,
at the E-site, can be exchanged. GTP is required at the E-site in order
for tubulin to polymerize. Upon polymerization, however, this
nucleotide is hydrolyzed and can no longer be exchanged.
|
|
..
|
|
The effect of GDP on microtubule
structure is dramatic. The microtubule loses both its ability to grow
and its stability; it quickly falls apart. Microtubules are thought to
be stabilized by a cap of GTP-containing tubulin subunits at the
microtubule ends. Loss of this "GTP-cap," e.g. through hydrolysis,
would result in rapid depolymerization. This model to explain dynamic
instability would greatly benefit from structural knowledge of how GTP
hydrolysis affects the tubulin components.
|
|
..
|
|
Structure and function
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
..
|
Figure 1
Ribbon representation of the αβ tubulin dimer (adapted from 3617). The PDB identifier of this structure is 1TUB.
|
|
..
|
|
>The structure of the tubulin dimer at 3.5
Å resolution was obtained by electron crystallography of tubulin sheets
stabilized with the anticancer drug taxol (3617; 3614)
(zinc was used to form sheets, in which the protofilaments are arranged
in an antiparallel fashion). As shown in Figure 1, the structures of
α- and β-tubulin
are nearly identical. Each subunit contains one molecule of guanine nucleotide,
but only β-tubulin binds taxol.
|
|
..
|
|
Each compact monomer contains three domains.
The N-terminal, nucleotide-binding domain is comprised of
six parallel β strands (S1-S6)
alternating with helices (H1-H6). The loops that connect the
β
strand with the next helix are directly involved in binding GTP (loops
T1 to T6). The core helix H7 connects the nucleotide-binding domain
with the smaller, second domain. This domain is formed by three helices
(H8-H10) and a mixed β sheet (S7-S10).
The C-terminal region is formed by two antiparallel helices (H11-H12)
that cross over the previous two domains.
|
|
..
|
|
The structure of tubulin explains the different nucleotide
exchangeabilities between α- and
β-tubulin and the coupling of polymerization
and hydrolysis. The GTP in α-tubulin
is not exchangeable because the N-site is buried at the monomer-monomer
interface within the dimer. In contrast, the GDP in β-tubulin
is exchangeable because the E-site is exposed on the surface of the
dimer. Upon polymerization, the E-site nucleotide becomes
nonexchangeable because it is buried at the newly formed interface.
|
|
..
|
Figure 2
Loops T1-T6 and helix H7 from β-tubulin constitute the nucleotide binding domain, but loop T7 and residue 254 from α-tubulin
are essential for nucleotide hydrolysis. The structure of the tubulin
heterodimer contains GDP in the E-site, due to nucleotide hydrolysis
during polymerization.
|
|
..
|
|
The interface between the monomers reveals that both subunits contribute
residues necessary for GTPase activity. Figure 2
illustrates the interface between dimers. Loop T7, which lies opposite
the nucleotide binding site of the next subunit, contains amino acids
that are required for nucleotide hydrolysis (GXXNXD). These residues
are highly conserved in both tubulin subunits. Residue 254 in the H8
helix completes the interaction across the longitudinal interface.
Lys254 in β-tubulin interacts with
the γ-phosphate of the N-site nucleotide in α-tubulin.
Glu254 in α-tubulin
would be close to the γ-phosphate of the E-site nucleotide (in the
crystal structure this nucleotide is GDP due to nucleotide hydrolysis
during polymerization). The lack of conservation at residue 254
explains why α-tubulin can hydrolyze the
GTP in β-tubulin, but
β-tubulin cannot hydrolyze the GTP in
α-tubulin.
|
|
..
|
|
Microtubule structure
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
..
|
Figure 3
β-tubulins, with GTP exposed, crown the
plus end of the microtubule. Addition of a tubulin dimer induces GTP
hydrolysis at the underlying β-tubulin.
This illustration includes the microtubule's "seam", where the lateral
contacts are not between identical tubulin isoforms.
|
|
..
|
|
The crystal structure of tubulin allowed us to produce a high-resolution
model of the microtubule (3619).
This was done by docking the structure of the tubulin protofilament
into a low-resolution model of the microtubule, which was previously
obtained by cryo-electron microscopy and helical image reconstruction
(3621). Figure 3 shows the results of our modeling.
|
|
..
|
|
The orientation of the α
β-tubulin
heterodimer within the microtubule has very important repercussions for
the GTP-cap model of microtubule dynamics. The plus end of the
microtubule is crowned by β-tubulin
subunits exposing their nucleotide surface to the solution, while the minus
end is crowned by α-subunits
exposing their catalytic end (loop T7 and residue 254). The plus end,
then, may be more dynamic because the hydrolyzable GTP is exposed right
at the end, where having GTP or GDP has the biggest effect on
microtubule stability. In contrast, the minus end consists of
α-subunits, which are always bound to GTP.
|
|
..
|
Figure 4
The interactions between protofilaments shed light on the stability of microtubules (adapted from 3619).
|
|
..
|
|
The high-resolution model of the microtubule also showed
that the interface between the protofilaments, seen in Figure 4,
underlies many properties of the microtubule, including the stabilizing
effect of taxol. The M-loop (the loop between S7 and H9) makes close
contacts with loop H1-S2 and helix H3 of the next subunit. The M-loop
may act as a hinge between subunits, thereby allowing microtubules to
be flexible in the number of protofilaments they contain. This explains
why reconstituted microtubules do not have the same number of
protofilaments. In α-tubulin,
the conformation of the M-loop is stabilized by the long S9-S10 loop.
In β-tubulin,
the S9-S10 loop is not as long, but the M-loop is an essential part of
the taxol binding pocket. Taxol and taxol-like compounds may stabilize
the M-loop of β-tubulin,
thereby affecting microtubule dynamics (3622).
|
|
..
|
|
Interestingly, another element that β-tubulin
contributes to the lateral interface, the H3 helix, follows loop T3.
Loop T3 is involved in binding the γ-phosphate of the E-site
nucleotide. Therefore, the destabilizing effect of nucleotide
hydrolysis may be due to a conformational change transmitted to H3
through the γ-phosphate sensing loop.
|
|
..
|
|
Legacy
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
..
|
|
More recent structures of tubulin have
been used to understand the effect of ligands that interfere with
microtubule dynamics. Knossow and coworkers obtained a high-resolution
structure of tubulin bound to the C-terminal fragment of RB3, a homolog
of stathmin proteins (3606). Their structure suggested that
stathmin proteins prevent tubulin polymerization by stabilizing a
curved form of protofilaments. This is the conformation protofilaments
assume when microtubules depolymerize. More recently, Sackett and
coworkers have used the structure of tubulin in an electron microscopy
study of tubulin bound to cryptophycin, an antimitotic agent (3623).
They found that cryptophycin also induces formation of curved protofilaments.
|
|
..
|
|
The structure of αβ-tubulin
has been extremely useful for analyzing other tubulin isoforms. A
homology model of γ-tubulin based on the structure of
αβ-tubulin
has been used to map mutations that affected microtubule dynamics in fission yeast (3620)
as well as to map mutants in Aspergillus that give rise to novel phenotypes (3609).
Analysis of the sequences of γ-, δ-, and ε-tubulin in regions corresponding to polymerization
interfaces in αβ-tubulin allowed us
to propose structural models of how different tubulins interact and affect microtubule self-assembly (3607).
|
|
..
|
|
FtsZ, a ubiquitous protein in eubacteria
and archebacteria essential for cytokinesis, is the only known
structural homolog of tubulin (3612). This was demonstrated
when the crystal structure of FtsZ was obtained (3612) and later
compared in detail with the structure of tubulin (3617).
Structural superposition of tubulin and FtsZ showed that the conserved
residues are localized to sites of interaction with the nucleotide as
well as T7 on the opposite side of the monomers. This led to a model of
FtsZ polymerization in which T7 contributed to the interaction with the
nucleotide in the next molecule along the filament. This model has been
recently demonstrated by electron microscopy and image analysis of FtsZ
filaments formed in vitro (3613).
|
|
..
|
|
The structural homology between tubulin
and FtsZ demonstrates another evolutionary link between eukaryotes and
prokaryotes. Every single cell, regardless of kingdom, contains either
tubulin or a homolog. This universality leads to the intriguing
speculation that the original function of tubulin was not moving
chromosomes and interacting with motors, but self-assembling into
contractile structures.
|
|
..
|
|
The author
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Eva Nogales obtained her B.S. degree in Physics by the Universidad Autonoma
de Madrid (Spain) in 1988. She did her thesis work at the Synchrotron
Radiation Source (U.K.), under the supervision of Dr. Joan Bordas, on
the structural dynamics of assembly of tubulin, earning a Ph.D. degree
by the Physics Department of the University of Keele in 1992. Her
postdoctoral work in Dr. Kenneth Downing's lab at Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory involved the use of electron crystallography to
determine the high-resolution structure of tubulin. In 1998 she became
Assistant Professor in the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology at
UC Berkeley, and in 2000 Assistant Investigator at HHMI. She is
presently a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Structural
Biology and of the Biophysical Society Council. Her work centers around
two main projects: the structural basis of microtubule dynamics and the
structural organization of the human transcriptional initiation
machinery. She uses electron microscopy, image analysis, homology
modeling, and functional biochemical assays to gain new information on
these systems and to progress toward models of how they are regulated
in the cell.
Contact details
Eva Nogales
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Molecular and Cell Biology Department
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720
Phone: 510 642 0557
Fax: 510 642 8806
E-mail: enogales@lbl.gov
|
|
..
|
|
Last Revised on September 23, 2004
|
|
..
|
-
3605 Desai, A. and Mitchison, T. J.
(1997).
Microtubule polymerization dynamics.
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 83-117.
PubMed Journal
-
3608 Jordan, A., Hadfield, J. A., Lawrence, N. J., and McGown, A. T.
(1998).
Tubulin as a target for anticancer drugs: agents which interact with the mitotic spindle.
Med Res Rev 18, 259-296.
PubMed Journal
-
3615 Ludueña, R. F.
(1998).
Multiple forms of tubulin: different gene products and covalent modifications.
Int. Rev. Cytol. 178, 207-275.
PubMed
|
-
3295 Mitchison, T. and Kirschner, M.
(1984).
Dynamic instability of microtubule growth.
Nature 312, 237-242.
PubMed
-
3606 Gigant, B., Curmi, P. A., Martin-Barbey, C.,
Charbaut, E., Lachkar, S., Lebeau, L., Siavoshian, S., Sobel, A., and
Knossow, M. (2000). The 4 A X-ray structure of a
tubulin:stathmin-like domain complex. Cell 102, 809-816.
PubMed Journal
-
3607 Inclan, Y. F. and Nogales, E.
(2001).
Structural models for the self-assembly and microtubule interactions of gamma-, delta- and epsilon-tubulin.
J. Cell Sci. 114, 413-422.
PubMed Journal
-
3609 Jung, M. K., Prigozhina, N., Oakley, C. E., Nogales, E., and Oakley, B. R.
(2001).
Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of Aspergillus gamma-tubulin yields diverse and novel phenotypes.
Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 2119-2136.
PubMed Journal
-
3612 Lowe, J. and Amos, L. A.
(1998).
Crystal structure of the bacterial cell-division protein FtsZ.
Nature 391, 203-206.
PubMed Journal
-
3613 Lowe, J. and Amos, L. A.
(1999).
Tubulin-like protofilaments in Ca2+-induced FtsZ sheets.
EMBO J. 18, 2364-2371.
PubMed Journal
-
3614 Lowe, J., Li, H., Downing, K. H., and Nogales, E.
(2001).
Refined structure of alpha beta-tubulin at 3.5 A resolution.
J. Mol. Biol. 313, 1045-1057.
PubMed Journal
-
3617 Nogales, E., Wolf, S. G., and Downing, K. H.
(1998).
Structure of the alpha beta tubulin dimer by electron crystallography.
Nature 391, 199-203.
PubMed Journal
-
3619 Nogales, E., Whittaker, M., Milligan, R. A., and Downing, K. H.
(1999).
High-resolution model of the microtubule.
Cell 96, 79-88.
PubMed Journal
-
3620 Paluh, J. L., Nogales, E., Oakley, B. R.,
McDonald, K., Pidoux, A. L., and Cande, W. Z. (2000). A mutation
in gamma-tubulin alters microtubule dynamics and organization and is
synthetically lethal with the kinesin-like protein pkl1p. Mol.
Biol. Cell 11, 1225-1239. PubMed Journal
-
3621 Sosa, H., Dias, D. P., Hoenger, A.,
Whittaker, M., Wilson-Kubalek, E., Sablin, E., Fletterick, R. J., Vale,
R. D., and Milligan, R. A. (1997). A model for the
microtubule-Ncd motor protein complex obtained by cryo-electron
microscopy and image analysis. Cell 90, 217-224. PubMed Journal
-
3622 Snyder, J. P., Nettles, J. H., Cornett, B., Downing, K. H., and Nogales, E.
(2001).
The binding conformation of Taxol in beta-tubulin: a model based on electron crystallographic density.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5312-5316.
PubMed Journal
-
3623 Watts, N. R., Cheng, N., West, W., Steven, A. C., and Sackett, D. L.
(2002).
The cryptophycin-tubulin ring structure indicates two points of curvature in the tubulin dimer.
Biochemistry 41, 12662-12669.
PubMed Journal
|
|
..
|
|
©Jones and Bartlett Publishers (2007)
|
|