|
GREAT EXPERIMENTS
Ubiquitin conjugation as a proteolytic signal: The first experiments
|
|
..
|
|
Avram Hershko and Aaron Ciechanover
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
..
|
|
The dynamic turnover of cellular proteins
was discovered during the pioneering studies of Rudolf Schoenheimer in
the 1930s, when he first used isotopically labeled compounds for
biological studies (1815). The discovery in the 1960s that
different enzymes in eukaryotic cells have widely varying half lives
made it evident that protein degradation is a highly selective process
that plays important roles in regulating metabolic processes (1809).
However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for this process remained
unknown. Up until this time, the lysosome was considered to be the sole
site of protein degradation, but it was clear that the activity of
lysosomal proteases was not selective. Still, certain studies attempted
to attribute selectivity to degradation within lysosomes. According to
one model, for example, all cellular proteins would be rapidly engulfed
by the lysosome, but only short-lived proteins would be degraded, while
long-lived proteins would escape back to the cytosol (1810).
|
|
..
|
|
Using an assay for measuring the release
of amino acids from proteins in liver slices, Simpson demonstrated that
energy is required for proteolysis (1805). A similar energy
requirement for the degradation of many other cellular proteins was
observed in a variety of experimental systems (1811). While
proteolysis per se is an exergonic process that does not require
energy, lysosomal degradation requires metabolic energy for the
activity of the proton pump that maintains the low acidic
intralysosomal pH. Therefore, the arrest of degradation observed when
energy production inhibitors were used could have been a secondary
effect of inhibition of the lysosomal proton pump.
|
|
..
|
|
Background
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
..
|
|
Despite this possible explanation for a
connection between lysosomes and the energy requirement for protein
degradation, Hershko was convinced that lysosomal autophagy could not
account for the selectivity and regulation of intracellular protein
breakdown. Hershko was attracted to the field as a postdoctoral fellow
in the laboratory of Gordon Tomkins 30 years ago (1969-71). At that
time, the main subject of research in the laboratory was the mechanism
by which corticosteroid hormones induce synthesis of tyrosine
aminotransferase (TAT). Hershko decided to study degradation, a process
that also regulates TAT levels. He found that the degradation of TAT in
cultured hepatoma cells is completely arrested by inhibitors of
cellular energy production, such as fluoride or azide (1789).
These results confirmed and extended the previous observations of
Simpson. From this point, Hershko considered the argument of whether
selective protein degradation could take place in the lysosome. He
concluded that it could not, since once proteins are engulfed by the
lysosome, they are degraded at a similar rate, and this degradation is
not substrate-specific. He assumed that the cell must be equipped with
a yet unknown proteolytic system that utilizes energy for the high
selectivity and specificity of protein degradation.
|
|
..
|
|
Experiments of Brian Poole and colleagues
lent support to this hypothesis when they demonstrated that degradation
of metabolically labeled intracellular proteins is not
affected by lysosomotropic agents such as chloroquine. These agents are
weak bases that dissipate the low intralysosomal pH and thus inhibit
the activity of lysosomal proteases. In striking contrast, the same
agents strongly inhibited degradation of pinocytosed extracellular
proteins, such as bovine serum albumin (BSA) (4105). These
experiments strongly suggested the existence of a proteolytic system(s)
that is distinct from the lysosome and that is involved in degradation
of intracellular proteins.
|
|
..
|
|
The experiment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
..
|
|
An ATP-dependent proteolytic system from reticulocytes
was first described by Etlinger and Goldberg (1806)
and a bit later by Hershko and Ciechanover (3768).
This was the stage when Aaron Ciechanover joined the Hershko's
laboratory as a graduate student. We were convinced that the best way
to characterize this novel proteolytic system was to use classical
biochemistry to fractionate and reconstitute the system in order to
identify, characterize and purify the different components and
determine their individual modes of action. Important support and
advice were provided by Irwin Rose, who hosted Hershko in his
laboratory for a sabbatical year in 1977-78, and also hosted us many
times afterwards.
|
|
..
|
Figure 1
Anion exchange chromatography of reticulocyte lysate into two complementing proteolytic activities. (Adapted from 1812.)
|
|
..
|
|
Because of its abundance, the first aim
was to remove hemoglobin from the reticulocyte extracts. This could be
achieved in a single ion exchange chromatography step over
DEAE-cellulose (an anion exchange resin). We resolved the lysate into
two fractions: Fraction 1, which contained nonadsorbed proteins
(including hemoglobin), and Fraction 2, which contained all the
proteins that were adsorbed to the resin and eluted with high salt. We
expected that the proteolytic activity would be found in Fraction 2,
but the Fraction contained only very low ATP-dependent proteolytic
activity towards the radiolabeled denatured globin that we used as a
proteolytic substrate. Fraction 1 did not have any activity. The
proteolytic activity could be recovered, however, following
reconstitution of Fractions 1 and 2, as shown in Figure 1 (1812).
This was a surprising finding, as until then proteolytic activities
were confined to single proteases, and researchers in the field had
been trying to characterize and purify them as such. This critically
important experiment taught us that we had at hand a complex system
that contained at least two (and more, as it turned out later)
complementing factors, rather than a single ATP-dependent protease.
|
|
..
|
|
From then, we used the power of
"classical" biochemistry and established a "complementing add and
subtract" experimental approach. Using this approach, each novel factor
was identified, purified and characterized by assaying its activity
(stimulation of ATP-dependent degradation of a labeled protein) against
the remaining crude fraction from which it was resolved/removed during
the previous purification step. For example, the active component in
Fraction 1 was purified to homogeneity via several purification steps
and characterized by assaying its stimulatory activity using crude
Fraction 2 in the assay (1790). This component in Fraction 1
was designated APF-1 (ATP-dependent Proteolytic Factor-1)
to denote that it was the first factor characterized. At the same time
we started to identify additional complementing factors from Fraction
2. APF-1 showed some unusual characteristics. It was a small (~8.5 kDa)
protein that was purified by taking advantage of its remarkable heat
stability: a single step, heating Fraction 1 to 90°C (which causes most
proteins to precipitate) resulted in a 210-fold purification of the
protein (1812; 1790). The protein we called APF-1
was later identified by Wilkinson and colleagues as ubiquitin (1791),
a known protein of hitherto unknown function.
|
|
..
|
|
Ubiquitin was first thought to be a
thymic hormone, but subsequently was found to be universally present in
many tissues and organisms — hence its name (1807).
It was found to be conjugated to a small proportion of histone 2A molecules (1814),
but did not target the protein for degradation, and its function in
this context has remained largely unknown. Though we did not know at
that time that APF-1 is ubiquitin, from the time we discovered the
identity between the two we adopted its original name, ubiquitin,
coined by the researcher who discovered it. For the purposes of this
text, we shall use the term APF-1/ubiquitin to describe experiments
carried out prior to the discovery of its common identity.
|
|
..
|
|
Purification of APF-1/ubiquitin from
Fraction 1 was the key to the elucidation of its mode of action in the
proteolytic system. Initially, we thought that it could be either an
activator or a regulatory subunit of a protease, or it could be a
component of a multienzyme cascade system, with the remaining
components of the pathway being contained in Fraction 2. To examine
these alternatives, purified APF-1/ubiquitin was radio-iodinated and
incubated with crude Fraction 2 in the presence or absence of ATP. Gel
filtration chromatography revealed a dramatic ATP-dependent shift of
125I-APF-1/ubiquitin to the high-molecular mass region (490).
Chemical analysis revealed that APF-1/ubiquitin generated a covalent
amide linkage with protein(s) in Fraction 2, as the high molecular mass
"complex" was stable to treatments with acid, alkali, hydroxylamine and
boiling with SDS and mercaptoethanol (490). Analysis of the
reaction products by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed that
APF-1/ubiquitin was covalently ligated to numerous proteins. Since
crude Fraction 2 from reticulocytes contains many endogenous substrates
that are degraded by the system, in addition to enzymes of the
proteolytic system itself, we suspected that APF-1/ubiquitin might be
linked to protein substrates rather than to enzymes of the system. In
support of this interpretation, efficient substrates for ATP-dependent
proteolysis, such as lysozyme, were found to form multiple conjugates
with APF-1/ubiquitin (though we realized that the substrates we used
were artificial, as they were all extracellular rather than
intracellular proteins). These multiple adducts represented a ladder
where an increasing number of APF-1/ubiquitin moieties are attached to
a single substrate molecule (1792).
|
|
..
|
Figure 2
Multiple molecules of APF-1/ubiquitin are covalently
attached to the protein substrate targeted for degradation. Complete
reaction mixtures including 125I-APF-1/ubiquitin and
increasing concentrations of lysozyme were resolved on SDS-PAGE (lanes
3-5), resulting in the appearance of several new bands (C1-C6). These
bands were not seen in the absence of ATP (lane 1) or added lysozyme
(lane 2; in this case, 125I-APF-1/ubiquitin became ligated
to endogenous substrates present in Fraction 2). 125I-labeled
lysozyme and unlabeled APF-1/ubiquitin were used in reactions in the
absence (lane 6) or presence (lane 7) of ATP. Whether complete
reactions were incubated in the presence of labeled lysozyme (lane 7)
or labeled APF-1/ubiquitin (lanes 3-5), the same bands (C1-C6)
appeared. "Cont" = contaminating protein in lysosomal preparation.
(Reproduced from 1792.)
|
|
..
|
|
Figure 2 shows the original experiment that convinced us that APF-1/ubiquitin is
ligated to the protein substrate. As can be clearly seen, similar
high-molecular weight derivatives (see C3 through C6) were formed when
125I-APF-1/ubiquitin was incubated in the presence of unlabeled
lysozyme (lanes 3-5), and when 125I-lysozyme
was incubated with unlabeled APF-1/ubiquitin (lane 7). The ~8.0 kDa
difference in the molecular mass of the bands corresponds to the size
of APF-1/ubiquitin, and analysis of the ratio of radioactivity in
APF-1/ubiquitin as compared to lysozyme indicated that the various
derivatives consisted of increasing numbers of APF-1/ubiquitin moieties
linked to a single molecule of lysozyme.
|
|
..
|
Figure 3
The predicted APF-1/ubiquitin proteolytic pathway, 1980.
The following enzymatic steps were proposed: 1. "APF-1-protein amide
synthetase" ligates APF-1/ubiquitin to the protein substrate. 2. a
"correction" amidase/isopeptidase that acts upon "erroneously" ligated
proteins. 3. a protease that cleaves peptide bonds, liberating
peptides, amino acids, and APF-1 linked to a short peptide ("APF-1•X").
4. an amidase/isopeptidase that cleaves the bond between APF-1 and
lysine residues. (Adapted from 1792.)
|
|
..
|
|
Based on these findings, in 1980 we proposed the model shown in Figure 3
that explains the role of APF-1/ubiquitin in marking intracellular
proteins for degradation, rendering them susceptible to recognition by
a downstream protease. We suggested that multiple molecules of
APF-1/ubiquitin are linked to ε-NH2 groups of internal Lys
residues in the protein substrate by an "APF-1-protein amide
synthetase" (Step 1). Proteins ligated to multiple APF-1/ubiquitin
moieties were proposed to be broken down by a specific protease that
recognizes such conjugates (Step 3). The products are free amino acids,
peptides, and APF-1/ubiquitin still linked by isopeptide linkage to
lysine or a small peptide ("APF-1•X"). Finally, free APF-1/ubiquitin is
released for reutilization by the action of a specific
amidase/isopeptidase (Step 4). According to a suggestion of Irwin Rose,
a hypothetical "correcting" isopeptidase was added to this scheme, that
would release free ubiquitin and substrate protein from adducts of
erroneously ligated proteins (Step 2). An isopeptidase that may have
such correction function has been described recently (1793).
We hypothesized that the conjugation step, Step 1 (catalyzed by the
putative "APF-1-protein amide synthetase") endows the system with its
high degree of specificity towards its many substrates (1811).
|
|
..
|
|
Subsequent work
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
..
|
Figure 4
The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway for intracellular
protein degradation, 2001. See text and explanations in the figure for
description of the pathway. Steps 1, 2, and 3 in this model correspond
to Step 1 of the original 1980 model (shown in Figure 3); the light
blue arrows at right correspond to Step 2 of the original model; Step 5
corresponds to Step 3 of the original model; and Step 6 corresponds to
Step 4 of the original model.
|
|
..
|
|
Comparison of the original model with our current
knowledge of the reactions of the ubiquitin pathway (shown in Figure 4)
(1819; for reviews see 1813; 996; 1818)
(and see Ubiquitination targets proteins for degradation),
shows that the original model was essentially correct, but more
components were discovered and details added that provide explanations
for the high specificity of ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Thus, we
have found that the predicted "APF-1-protein amide synthetase" is
composed of three types of enzymes: a ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1, a
ubiquitin-carrier protein, E2, and a ubiquitin-protein ligases, E3 (1794).
|
|
..
|
|
E1 activates ubiquitin, in an
ATP-dependent reaction, in which the C-terminal residue of ubiquitin
binds to an internal residue in E1 (Step 1). The activated ubiquitin is
then transferred through any one of several ubiquitin-carrier proteins,
E2s, to the substrate, which is complexed specifically (1795)
with a member of one of the two known ubiquitin-protein ligase
families, or E3s. In the case of a RING-H2 domain E3, the transfer is
direct, from E2 to the E3-bound substrate (Step 2, to the left). In the
case of HECT (Homologous to the E6-AP C-T
terminal) domain-E3, the transfer is mediated by an E3-ubiquitin
intermediate (Step 2, to the right). The two families of E3s, the RING
finger- and HECT domain-containing proteins, are composed of many
members that recognize specific structural features in the target
substrates, and thus account for substrate selectivity. These proteins
catalyze the last step in the conjugation process, covalent attachment
of ubiquitin to the substrate. The first ubiquitin moiety is
transferred to an ε-NH2 group of an internal Lys residue
of the protein substrate (although in some cases it can be conjugated linearly
to the free α-NH2)
to generate an isopeptide bond. This is followed by successive transfer
of additional activated ubiquitin moieties to the previously conjugated
ubiquitin molecule to generate a polyubiquitin chain (Step 3).
|
|
..
|
|
The chain probably serves as a
recognition marker for the protease (Step 4). Additional work led to
corroboration of a key step of the model, in which only
ubiquitin-tagged proteins are targeted by the protease and then
degraded to short peptides (Step 5) (1796). The protease was purified
and characterized initially by Rechsteiner and colleagues (1797) and
later by Goldberg and colleagues (1798),
and was identified as the 26S proteasome complex. It was found that ATP
is required not only to catalyze ubiquitin-protein ligation, as
originally proposed, but also for the action of the 26S proteasome
(1796; 1797; 1798).Finally,
free and reusable ubiquitin is released by the action of a large
variety of ubiquitin-C-terminal hydrolases (Step 6, reviewed in 1813).
|
|
..
|
|
Because we carried out all of our
studies in a cell-free reconstituted system from terminally
differentiating reticulocytes and used secretory model proteins as
substrates, the problem of the physiological relevance of our initial
findings had remained open. The first evidence that the system plays a
role in degradation of proteins in vivo came from immunochemical
analysis of ubiquitin adducts in nucleated eukaryotic cells (1799).
Cells were incubated in the presence of amino acid analogs to induce
synthesis of abnormal, rapidly degrading proteins. Antibodies we raised
against ubiquitin were then used to monitor the initial level and
kinetics of decay of ubiquitin-protein adducts. We found that
immediately following incubation of cells with the amino acid analog,
the level of the conjugates was significantly higher compared with
cells that were incubated without the analog. This reflected the rapid
degradation of this pool of abnormal proteins even as their synthesis
had just begun. Blocking protein synthesis resulted in the rapid
disappearance of the abnormal proteins, along with a concomitant
disappearance of the adducts. Thus, the rate of formation and
degradation of the short-lived, abnormal proteins was in tight and
direct correlation with that of their respective adducts. These
findings strongly suggested that the adducts indeed serve as essential
intermediates in the proteolytic process.
|
|
..
|
|
A stronger and more direct proof for the
involvement of the ubiquitin system in the degradation of cellular
proteins came from observations of Alexander Varshavsky, Daniel Finley
and Aaron Ciechanover. They found that a cell cycle arrest mutant that
harbors a thermolabile E1 is also defective in degradation of abnormal,
amino acid analog-containing short-lived proteins at the nonpermissive
temperature (1800; 1801). In parallel, the first targeting
signal in the substrate (out of many that were later discovered)
—
the N-terminal residue
—
was also identified using both a biochemical approach (1802; 1803),
and a more thorough and systematic genetic approach (1804).
This mode of recognition, which is dependent on the identity of the
free N-terminal residue, was designated by Varshavsky and colleagues
the "N-end rule" pathway.
|
|
..
|
|
The legacy
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
..
|
|
In the two decades that have followed,
it has become clear that the proteolysis of ubiquitinated proteins
plays a major role in a broad array of basic cellular processes. Among
these are regulation of the cell cycle, differentiation and
development, the cellular response to stress, modulation of cell
surface receptors and ion channels, DNA repair, regulation of the
immune and inflammatory responses, biogenesis of organelles, and
quality control in the cytosol and the secretory pathway
(see Protein degradation is important in mitosis and The translocon forms a pore).
The list of cellular proteins targeted by the ubiquitin system has
grown exponentially and includes (to mention a few): cell cycle
regulators, tumor suppressors and growth modulators, transcriptional
activators and their inhibitors, cell surface receptors and endoplasmic
reticulum proteins. Mutated or otherwise damaged/misfolded proteins are
also recognized specifically and removed rapidly. With the many
substrates targeted and processes involved, it is not surprising that
aberrations in the system have been implicated in the pathogenesis of
many diseases, including malignancies, neurodegeneration, and disorders
of the immune and inflammatory responses. Drug companies are attempting
to develop drugs based on these mechanisms to modulate the degradation
of normal and abnormal proteins in different disease states.
|
|
..
|
|
As pointed out in (1808), the
main lesson from our story is the continued importance of the use of
biochemistry in modern biomedical research. Without biochemistry, it is
doubtful whether an entirely novel system could have been discovered.
On the other hand, molecular genetics was essential to uncovering the
myriad roles of the system in vivo.
|
|
..
|
|
The authors
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Avram Hershko (left) was born in Karcag, Hungary in 1937. He immigrated to
Israel in 1950. He obtained his M.D. degree in 1964 and his Ph.D.
degree in 1969 from "Hadassah" and the Hebrew University School of
Medicine in Jerusalem, Israel. During the years 1967-69, Avram served
in the Israel Defense Forces (I.D.F.) as a military physician.
Following his graduate studies, Avram joined the laboratory of Gordon
Tomkins in the University of California in San Francisco in the U.S.
where he initiated his studies on intracellular protein degradation. He
returned to Israel in 1972 and joined the newly established Faculty of
Medicine in the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, in Haifa,
where he continued his studies on protein degradation. In 1976, Aaron
Ciechanover joined his laboratory as a graduate student, and together
they discovered the ubiquitin proteolytic system. Avram is currently a
Professor of Biochemistry in the Faculty of Medicine of the Technion.
Along with Aaron Ciechanover and Alexander Varshavsky, he shared the
2000 Lasker Award for Basic Medical Research.
Aaron Ciechanover (right) was born in Haifa, Israel in 1947. He
obtained his M.Sc. Degree in 1970 and his M.D. degree in 1972 from
"Hadassah" and the Hebrew University School of Medicine in Jerusalem,
Israel. Following national service in the Israel Defense Forces
(I.D.F.) as a military physician, Aaron started his graduate studies in
the laboratory of Avram Hershko at the Faculty of Medicine of the
Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, in Haifa, Israel. During his
studies (1976-81), they discovered the ubiquitin proteolytic system.
After completing his Ph.D. thesis, Aaron joined Harvey Lodish's
laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the U.S.
While there, he studied receptor-mediated endocytosis and also
different aspects of the ubiquitin system, some in collaboration with
Alexander Varshavsky and Daniel Finley, and some independently.
Following his postdoctoral training, Aaron returned to the Faculty of
Medicine of the Technion in Haifa, Israel, where he is currently a
Professor. He shared the 2000 Lasker Award for Basic Medical Research
with Avram Hershkoand Alexander Varshavsky.
Avram Hershko
Aaron Ciechanover
Department of Biochemistry
The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine
and the Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences
Technion-Israel Institute of Technology
Haifa 31096, Israel
Phone: 972 4 829 5356
Fax: 972 4 851 3922
E-mail: hershko@tx.technion.ac.il
E-mail: mdaaron@tx.technion.ac.il
|
|
..
|
|
Last Revised on October 22, 2004
|
|
..
|
-
996 Voges, D., Zwickl, P., and Baumeister, W.
(1999).
The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis.
Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 1015-1068.
PubMed Journal
-
1808 Hershko, A.
(1996).
Lessons from the discovery of the ubiquitin system.
Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 445-449.
PubMed Journal
-
1809 Schimke, R.T., and Doyle, D.
(1970).
Control of enzyme levels in animal tissues.
Annu. Rev. Biochem. 39, 929-976.
PubMed Journal
-
1811 Hershko, A. and Ciechanover, A.
(1982).
Mechanisms of intracellular protein breakdown.
Annu. Rev. Biochem. 51, 335-364.
PubMed Journal
-
1813 Hershko, A., and Ciechanover, A.
(1998).
The ubiquitin system.
Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425-479.
PubMed Journal
-
1815 Schoenheimer, R.
(1942).
The Dynamic State of Body Constituents (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
-
1818 Weissman, A. M.
(2001).
Themes and variations on ubiquitylation.
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 169-178.
PubMed Journal
-
1819 Hilt, W., and Wolf, D.H
(2000).
Proteasomes: The World of Regulatory Proteolysis (Austin, TX: Landes Bioscience), pp. 1-139.
-
3768 Hershko, A., Heller, H., Ganoth, D., and Ciechanover, A.
(1978).
Mode of degradation of abnormal globin chains in rabbit reticulocytes. In Protein Turnover and Lysosome Function Segal, H L and Doyle, D J, eds. (New York: Academic Press), pp. 149-169.
|
-
490 Ciechanover, A. et al.
(1980).
ATP-dependent conjugation of reticulocyte proteins with the polypeptide required for protein degradation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 1365-1368.
PubMed
-
1789 Hershko, A. and Tomkins, G. M. (1971).
Studies on the degradation of tyrosine aminotransferase in
hepatoma cells in culture. Influence of the composition of the medium
and adenosine triphosphate dependence. J. Biol. Chem. 246,
710-714. PubMed
-
1790 Ciechanover, A., Elias, S., Heller, H., Ferber, S., and Hershko, A.
(1980).
Characterization of the heat-stable polypeptide of the ATP-dependent proteolytic system from reticulocytes.
J. Biol. Chem. 255, 7525-7528.
PubMed
-
1791 Wilkinson, K. D., Urban, M. K., and Haas, A. L.
(1980).
Ubiquitin is the ATP-dependent proteolysis factor I of rabbit reticulocytes.
J. Biol. Chem. 255, 7529-7532.
PubMed
-
1792 Hershko, A., Ciechanover, A., Heller, H.,
Haas, A. L., and Rose, I. A. (1980). Proposed role of ATP in
protein breakdown: conjugation of protein with multiple chains of the
polypeptide of ATP-dependent proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 77, 1783-1786. PubMed
-
1793 Lam, Y. A., Xu, W., DeMartino, G. N., and Cohen, R. E.
(1997).
Editing of ubiquitin conjugates by an isopeptidase in the 26S proteasome.
Nature 385, 737-740.
PubMed
-
1794 Hershko, A., Heller, H., Elias, S., and Ciechanover, A.
(1983).
Components of ubiquitin-protein ligase system. Resolution, affinity purification, and role in protein breakdown.
J. Biol. Chem. 258, 8206-8214.
PubMed
-
1795 Hershko, A., Heller, H., Eytan, E., and Reiss, Y.
(1986).
The protein substrate binding site of the ubiquitin-protein ligase system.
J. Biol. Chem. 261, 11992-11999.
PubMed
-
1796 Hershko, A., Leshinsky, E., Ganoth, D., and Heller, H.
(1984).
ATP-dependent degradation of ubiquitin-protein conjugates.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 1619-1623.
PubMed
-
1797 Hough, R., Pratt, G., and Rechsteiner, M.
(1986). Ubiquitin-lysozyme conjugates. Identification and
characterization of an ATP-dependent protease from rabbit reticulocyte
lysates. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 2400-2408. PubMed Journal
-
1798 Waxman, L., Fagan, J. M., and Goldberg, A.
L. (1987). Demonstration of two distinct high molecular weight
proteases in rabbit reticulocytes, one of which degrades ubiquitin
conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 2451-2457. PubMed
-
1799 Hershko, A., Eytan, E., Ciechanover, A., and
Haas, A. L. (1982). Immunochemical analysis of the turnover of
ubiquitin-protein conjugates in intact cells. Relationship to the
breakdown of abnormal proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 257,
13964-13970. PubMed
-
1800 Finley, D., Ciechanover, A., and Varshavsky, A.
(1984).
Thermolability of ubiquitin-activating enzyme from the mammalian cell cycle mutant ts85.
Cell 37, 43-55.
PubMed Journal
-
1801 Ciechanover, A., Finley, D., and Varshavsky, A.
(1984).
Ubiquitin dependence of selective protein degradation demonstrated in the mammalian cell cycle mutant ts85.
Cell 37, 57-66.
PubMed Journal
-
1802 Hershko, A., Heller, H., Eytan, E., Kaklij, G., and Rose, I. A.
(1984).
Role of the alpha-amino group of protein in ubiquitin-mediated protein breakdown.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 7021-7025.
PubMed
-
1803 Ferber, S. and Ciechanover, A.
(1987).
Role of arginine-tRNA in protein degradation by the ubiquitin pathway.
Nature 326, 808-811.
PubMed Journal
-
1804 Bachmair, A., Finley, D., and Varshavsky, A.
(1986).
In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue.
Science 234, 179-186.
PubMed
-
1805 Simpson, M.V.
(1953).
The release of labeled amino acids from proteins in liver slices.
J. Biol. Chem. 201, 143-154.
PubMed
-
1806 Etlinger, J. D. and Goldberg, A. L.
(1977).
A soluble ATP-dependent proteolytic system responsible for the degradation of abnormal proteins in reticulocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 54-58.
PubMed
-
1807 Goldstein, G., Scheid, M., Hammerling, U.,
Schlesinger, D. H., Niall, H. D., and Boyse, E. A. (1975).
Isolation of a polypeptide that has lymphocyte-differentiating
properties and is probably represented universally in living cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 11-15. PubMed
-
1810 Haider, M. and Segal, H. L.
(1972).
Some characteristics of the alanine aminotransferase- and arginase-inactivating system of lysosomes.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 148, 228-237.
PubMed
-
1812 Ciehanover, A., Hod, Y., and Hershko, A.
(1978).
A heat-stable polypeptide component of an ATP-dependent proteolytic system from reticulocytes.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 81, 1100-1105.
PubMed
-
1814 Goldknopf, I. L. and Busch, H.
(1977).
Isopeptide linkage between nonhistone and histone 2A polypeptides of chromosomal conjugate-protein A24.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 864-868.
PubMed
-
4105 Poole, B., Ohkuma, S., and Warburton, M.
(1978).
Some aspects of the intracellular breakdown of exogenous and endogenous proteins. In Protein Turnover and Lysosome Function Segal, H. L. and Doyle, D. J. , eds. (New York: Academic Press), pp. 43-58.
|
|
..
|
|
©Jones and Bartlett Publishers (2007)
|
|